Divorcee dating

26-Feb-2018 18:57

But Ash Edwards, a businessman who lent Mrs Young more than £100,000 to pursue her case against Mr Young, said some of the investors felt let down by her behaviour and that she is doing other women no favours.

Mr Edwards, 45, said: “Michelle Young portrayed herself as a victim and to me it felt like an investment opportunity to help someone who had been deceived by a rich man using the failings of the British justice system to get away with it.

They say that she has repeatedly turned down the opportunity to take a divorce settlement of £26m awarded by the High Court from which she could have repaid her investors.

And instead of doing so they say Mrs Young has run up further costs pursuing the millions she claims her estranged husband squirrelled away in offshore trusts and accounts before his death.

He said: “It’s unbelievable the way she has behaved.

That meant that she owed them £11.2m, they claim, which would in theory have still left her with £14.8m from the High Court settlement – a substantial sum by anyone’s standards.

We’ve even offered her a settlement, reducing the amount she owes us, but she has refused.” Mr Edwards, a former City banker who now runs a property business in Thailand, said some of his fellow investors had been left in financial difficulties because of Mrs Young’s refusal to pay them back.

“I’m very disappointed that having presented herself as a victim she now seems to be as manipulative as she claims Scott Young was,” said Mr Edwards, who is married with two young sons.

Mr Sutton said: “Michelle Young has been the single biggest obstacle in preventing her own judgment being enforced.

She has refused to work with her investors to seek resolution to this Judgement Order, which has led them to question her intentions.

That meant that she owed them £11.2m, they claim, which would in theory have still left her with £14.8m from the High Court settlement – a substantial sum by anyone’s standards.We’ve even offered her a settlement, reducing the amount she owes us, but she has refused.” Mr Edwards, a former City banker who now runs a property business in Thailand, said some of his fellow investors had been left in financial difficulties because of Mrs Young’s refusal to pay them back.“I’m very disappointed that having presented herself as a victim she now seems to be as manipulative as she claims Scott Young was,” said Mr Edwards, who is married with two young sons.Mr Sutton said: “Michelle Young has been the single biggest obstacle in preventing her own judgment being enforced.She has refused to work with her investors to seek resolution to this Judgement Order, which has led them to question her intentions.Try our website today and meet new friends, find love and romance with a perfect partner, or simply meet other dates online who share similar interests as you.